Data exported from the LabQuest 2 can easily be imported into Plot.ly. Plot.ly seemed to explode onto the education scene this summer, or maybe I was just paying more attention. If data sets are large or more sophisticated analysis is required: Graphs can be shared via a link and an image can be embedded in the Google document. For small data sets and applying linear fits in a meaningful manner, it is fantastic. If additional analysis is required and the data sets are relatively small: Students will import these into their Google Document and create whatever is required for their lab report. For some labs, the data and graphs produced on the LabQuest 2 are sufficient. Data and graphs can be exported to the Chromebook via the web page. Students can then access the device, the data, and graphs via Chrome. The LabQuest 2 hosts its own web page as part of their Connected Science System. Vernier’s LabQuest 2 can create its own ad-hoc network or connect to the school’s wireless network. The workflow depends on the amount of data acquired and the level of graphical analysis required. Everything starts and ends with this learning-management system. While I’m sure the toolchain will change throughout the semester, and there will be surprises (both pleasant and otherwise), here is the starting toolchain: Chromebooks were new to me so, it took some time this summer to find the apps to support the workflow I want for this class. Updated : This story was updated with additional information on the spyware vendor responsible for the Microsoft and Chrome vulnerabilities.This fall, my AP Physics 2 classes will be using Chromebooks as part of my school district’s 1:1 pilot. “However, the increasing demand for these capabilities and the ecosystem that supplies them is more of a challenge.” “Attackers needing more exploits to maintain their capabilities is a good thing - and it reflects increased cost to the attackers from security measures that close known vulnerabilities,” Threat Analysis Group researchers Maddie Stone and Clement Lecigne wrote in a blog post. The majority of exploits discovered by Google’s Threat Analysis Group in 2021 were developed and sold by commercial providers to government-backed cybercriminal groups, researchers noted. But it could also be in part to the growing commercial availability of zero-days, once the tool of select nation-states with major hacking expertise. Researchers speculate the shift could be the result of increased detection and disclosure from vendors like Apple and Google. Just halfway into 2021 there have been 33 publicly disclosed zero-day exploits, 11 more than the total for all of 2020. The four exploits comprise part of the major uptick of in-the-wild zero-day attacks Google researchers have identified this year. Google believes the hackers behind the Safari zero-day are the same Russian hackers as those behind a widespread phishing campaign impersonating USAID employees reported by Microsoft in May. The hackers exploited a vulnerability in Safari to conduct the campaign. In an unrelated campaign, attackers used LinkedIn Messaging to target government officials from western European countries by sending them malicious links. Targets of the spyware included journalists, activists, politicians, dissidents and human rights workers. A related Microsoft investigation found at least 100 victims of the company’s spyware across countries including Palestine, Israel, Iran, the United Kingdom. Apple fixed the vulnerability and it doesn’t appear any Safari users were affected.Ī Citizen Lab report on Thursday tied the spyware to Candiru, an Israel-based spyware company the sells to governments. Chrome graphical analysis code#The vulnerability existed in code shared with Apple’s browser engine WebKit, making Safari also vulnerable. The links sent users targets to attacker-controlled domains that fingerprinted a user’s device and allowed hackers to determine if they would send the exploit. They sent the exploits via email with links posing as legitimate websites. The same surveillance group also cashed in with two vulnerabilities in Chrome over the past several months. “Even if a user was to uninstall Internet Explorer, the exploit would still work.” “This exploit was delivered via an Office document rather than via the Internet Explorer browser ,” explained Shane Huntley, director of Google’s Threat Analysis Group. In April and June cybercriminals targeted Armenian users with the exploit, researchers found. The campaign largely targeted victims in Armenia. Hackers are still using vulnerabilities in the seven-year-old Internet Explorer 11 browser to go after targets, even as Microsoft plans to sunset the program in less than a year, researchers at Google’s Threat Analysis Group reported Wednesday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |